Mail clients for macOS. An ideal email client for a desktop - is there such a thing at all? Mail program for mac

Apple's standard apps are enough for most. This applies not only to the email client, but also to notes, reminders, calendar and music player. However, standard Mail is only good if you don't compare it with third-party apps. The editors of the site took a look at several main alternatives to the macOS mail client.

Airmail

Developers position Airmail as "the fastest email client for Mac" and at least do not disappoint. The app is fast, fluid, and looks good on the outside - just like the other alternatives. But Airmail is also a feature-rich client that has features not available in the standard client.

Airmail lets you write in Markdown and HTML, has support for third-party apps (OmniFocus, Things, Wunderlist, and more) and support for AppleScript. You can sort your inbox by To Do, Done, and Memo.

The app has recently been released for iOS. One of the disadvantages of the client is the price. The macOS version costs $ 9.99, and the iOS version costs $ 4.99.

Pros:

1. Support for third-party applications.
2. The speed of work.
3. Support for standard Gmail hotkeys.

Minuses:

1. Price.
2. Problems with IMAP folders.
3. Lack of some functions available in other email clients.

Postbox

Postbox has been around since Mac launched App Store... Externally, the client is similar to standard Mail and Mozilla Thuderbird. However, in a recent update, Postbox's appearance has changed noticeably.

The advantage of Postbox is its functionality. The client supports work with several mail accounts at the same time, search by attachments and response templates. The user can reply to emails by clicking on the button with templates and choosing one of the appropriate options.

Postbox costs $ 15 and can only be purchased from the developer's website. You can also download a trial version there and use it for free for 30 days. In addition, there is a two-month money-back guarantee - in fact, the client can be used for free for three months.

Pros:

1. Functionality.
2. The ability to respond with pre-created templates.
3. Free trial period.

Minuses:

1. No client for iOS.
2. Overloaded interface.
3. Lack of Exchange support.

Polymail

Polymail just came out of testing a month ago, but managed to establish itself as one of the best email clients. The developers managed to combine a simple interface and an abundance of interesting features. For example, Polymail shows read receipts for sent emails and can schedule sending at the right time.

The advantages of Polymail include regular updates - developers are constantly fixing bugs and introducing new features. Unlike the alternatives, Polymail is free in both macOS and iOS versions. There is no paid functionality.

Pros:

1. The ability to receive notifications about read messages.
2. You can postpone sending letters "for later".
3. The app is free.

Minuses:

1. There are still minor bugs.
2. Sometimes the application does not send notifications about new messages.

Mail pilot

According to the developers, Mail Pilot is a client aimed at maximum productivity. The interface is simple here, despite this, the application combines an email client and a task manager. The client is available for macOS, iOS, and watchOS.

In Mail Pilot, you can combine letters into lists, so it is more convenient to work with large tasks. The price of productivity is high - macOS is $ 19.99, mobile is $ 9.99.

Pros:

1. Supports the entire Apple ecosystem.
2. Email client and task manager in one application.
3. Nice interface.

Minuses:

1. A non-standard approach to an email client may not work for some users.
2. High price.

Mail

Aside from the complaints about the mediocre Gmail experience and the need to periodically clear the attachment cache, Mail is one of the best email clients for macOS. For many - the best, because the standard.

All Mail's benefits are tied to the Apple ecosystem. You can search for emails in Spotlight, send replies from the notification center, and sign documents right in the app.

Pros:

1. Apple standard app.
2. Is free.
3. There is support for macOS, iOS, watchOS.

Minuses:

1. Mediocre work with Gmail, especially on iOS.
2. Less, in comparison with third-party clients, functionality.

OS X's built-in Mail client is a prime example of what a cool product can be. I have been using it for 3 years now and it suits me in almost everything. Its design is ideal in my opinion, and in terms of functionality, many recognize it as one of the best email clients not only for Mac, but in general all existing ones.

However, Mail has its own serious flaws. For example, the lack of support for tags in emails. For some reason, Apple implemented it in the Finder and refused to do it with mail, although this is where the tags are more needed. Yes, there are MailTags, but its cost makes one think before buying.

Or the situation with aliases: I have connected an alias [email protected] to my corporate mailbox and every time I send using an alias, I have to manually select an SMTP server, Mail does not provide an opportunity to configure the binding of aliases to individual servers.

AirMail

Price: $9.99

Supported OS: Mac OS X, iOs

An email client with a very nice and modern interface. The controls are arranged so that they take up a minimum of usable space while leaving it in the viewport. The program itself is very convenient to use, unlike analogs. If you are thinking of replacing Mail, then AirMail might be a great candidate.

A separate mention is the mode of displaying attachments and images in PostBox. Using it when searching for files in emails can be a huge time saver, although Mail supports email search with a filter by file type. In all other respects, except for the design, PostBox repeats the functionality of Mozilla Thunderbird and it makes sense to buy the program only for those who care about its appearance.

Advantages:

• Quick reply form;
• Editable message labels;
• A large number of settings for aliases;
• Advanced search by messages;
• Attachment browser;

Disadvantages:

• Not the most original interface design;
• Not all extensions are ported correctly;
• Doesn't work with Microsoft Exchange.

Mozilla Thunderbird

Price: is free

Supported OS: Mac OS X, Windows, Linux

The built-in macOS mail client got stuck in its development sometime in 2008. The same interface, the same set of functions, and nothing that would distinguish the classic Mail app from its competitors.

Therefore, I set out to look at the products that third-party developers offer and choose the best ones.

I will not put forward any criteria in advance, because it does not make sense now. All email clients are good, and it is impossible to speak unambiguously about the leadership of any of them, because for the first time in many years they have become truly different. It's not just about different interfaces and design solutions. The tasks that developers undertake to solve today are very different.

Someone wants to simplify correspondence by mail and turn it into a messenger, someone, on the contrary, insists on the classic methods of correspondence. Someone puts safety at the top, and some team work.

Spark

Spark client interface with delegate functionality

The product of the Readdle company, which is now the most actively developing in the field of mail clients. Spark came at a time when the industry was stagnant and many popular email clients (including Mailbox and Google Inbox) were shutting down. Readdle with its multifunctional application managed to break out into the leaders. Spark can:

• Send emails with a delay... That is, first we write and draw up the letter, then we set the date of sending, and then Spark sends it itself.
• Delegating emails... If the company has an employee for whom the information in the letter will be more useful, and he himself can give an answer to the sender, then the letter can be delegated through a special menu so that another person can take control of it.
• Working on a letter as a team... You can compose text as a team, format it, add files, etc. This opens a mini-chat for online communication.

Pros:

• Many options for teamwork.
• High speed of work.
• System of automatic sorting of letters by tags.
• Integration with third-party programs (Things, Todoist, Evernote and others).

Minuses:

• Some functionality is dependent on the Readdle servers to function and they sometimes fail.
• To work in a team, you need an expensive subscription.

Canary mail

This is what the dark theme looks like in Canary Mail

The first paid email client on our list with a ton of features and a strong focus on email security. The Canary developers use advanced email encryption techniques to prevent anyone from gaining access to your data. Moreover, they are active by default, i.e. application security works at the maximum level from the first launch.

There are also many useful functions in everyday life:

• Cleaning your mailbox from spam and annoying mailings.
• Smart Search: You can enter something like "unread newsletters" to get all the news in a single list.
• Read receipts. You can embed a script in the letter that will send you a notification when your letter is opened.
• Instant unsubscribe from any mailing list in one click.
• Prepared letters for quick sending, so as not to write the same thing every time and not to reissue the letters.

Pros:

• Automatic encryption of sent emails.
• Many handy features, including read receipts and the ability to postpone the letter until a later date.
• Nice interface.

Minuses:

• High price.
• Poor localization of the Russian language.
• Not very conveniently located controls.

Unibox

This is what the contact list on the left looks like.

This client is good primarily for its interface. In the sidebar of standard mailers, mailboxes and individual letters are displayed. In Unibox, your interlocutors are displayed there, regardless of whether they are real people or mailing services. This approach makes it easier to work with mail - you no longer need to enter names in the search or somehow tag individual people. All of them are displayed in a single list.

In this case, if you select the interlocutor, then the entire history of the conversation will be displayed in the form of a chat on the right side of the interface. Moreover, with one click, you can turn on the display of all attachments that have ever been sent between you and your interlocutor.

Pros:

• A single contact list instead of separate letters.
• Chat chat design.
• Separate window with attachments.

Minuses:

• There is no tag system for sorting emails.
• Price.

Airmail

Airmail interface and separate mail window

The Airmail developers are immodest guys who openly declare that their client is the best of all. This product is tightly integrated with macOS and supports all key features, be it Handoff (the function of instant synchronization between your computer, tablet and smartphone), AppleScript, Time Machine or multi-touch gestures on MacBook trackpads.

Pros:

• Instant replies interface (you can give a reaction to the letter with one click).
• Full control over the list of previous actions. Time is given to undo the last action (for example, if you accidentally deleted the letter).
• Work offline.
• The support service works around the clock.
• Fully integrated with all macOS features. Works even better than the built-in client.

Minuses:

• Price.
• Lack of demo version for testing.

Outlook

The cross-platform program is demonstrated here.

The mail client that comes with Office 365. In fact, this is an organizer, because not only mail is built in here, but also a calendar with a notebook. Microsoft is endlessly talking about security and smart features that will somehow help clear up the mail jams. Personally, I did not see them.

This is generally the only email client that I will go through with criticism. It is inconvenient, bulky, costs insane money, creates confusion and does not bring anything new to the work with mail.

The only thing that pleases me is a cool mobile client, but that one was not created by Microsoft. She bought a ready-made application and renamed it.

Pros:

• Nice mobile app.
• Laconic design.
• Cross-platform application (works on Android, Windows, iOS).

Minuses:

• Price.
• Confusing interface.

Thunderbird

Here is such a classic mailer without frills

An Orthodox email client that was developed by Mozilla back in 2004. It hasn't changed much since then. Company principles:

• Leave the classic extensible and customizable interface.
• Ensure the security of incoming and outgoing mail.
• Provide support for all existing encodings.

Pros:

• Classic tabbed interface.
• Manual parameter setting mailboxes.
• Integrated calendar.
• Development through a community of enthusiasts.
• Sorting mail by tags.
• Automatic blocking of suspicious content (protects against surveillance).
• Smart search with one-click message filtering functions.

Minuses:

• There are no reminders about letters and the ability to postpone an incoming message until a later date.
• There is no automatic box configuration.
• The classic design can be considered a plus only for those who are used to it. For young users, it is very outdated.
• No mobile client.

Spike

Interface with letters

Spike is an attempt to turn mail into chats. In classic clients, emails are often sorted as separate entities. Sometimes it is impossible to find a connection between letters on similar topics from the same addressee. Spike solves this problem by turning e-mail correspondence into correspondence in the manner of instant messengers.

Your messages on the right, messages of the interlocutor on the left. It is immediately visible when someone is typing to you, it is immediately visible when your message has been read. You can even call if the correspondence is not enough. In general, Spike is a messenger in which you do not need to register, since it works on the basis of your mailbox.

Pros:

• Messenger-style interface.
• Ability to send files, drawings, record audio messages.
• Support for audio and video calls.
• Built-in calendar.
• Group chats.
• Separate sorting of people and mailings from robots.
• Postponing the letter for later.
• Mobile client.

Minuses:

• If you do not take into account the unsympathetic design, then there are none at all.

I've reviewed the most popular email clients for MacOs. I hope my article will help you with a successful choice.

Post Views: 589

There are tons of email programs for Windows and Mac, but many of us still use our services through a web browser. Maybe there are good reasons for this? Today we are dealing with email clients - what are the benefits of them, what are the harm, and is it possible to find the ideal one at all.

Let's start, as usual, with a good one. Email clients have many advantages over their web options.

No ads and other information trash

A lot of unnecessary information appears along with letters on the mail page in a web browser. Annoying ads, news, links to other services, pop-up tips and tricks are all terribly annoying. All this is missing in email clients, especially if you are using the paid version.

You can connect several boxes at once and not get confused

Most often, we use several mailboxes at once, and on different services. For example, one address is working, another is personal, the third is for secondary information that is sent to the mail after registering in online stores, on forums, services, and so on.

Switching between links in the browser in order to have instant access to the contents of the boxes is inconvenient: for this they must always be open in the browser. And there will be one email client, no matter how many accounts you have.

You can view letters even if there is no Internet

Usually, when using the mail application, letters are saved on your computer. This means that you will be able to view incoming and sent messages even when there is no network connection. When working through a browser, for obvious reasons, there will be no such possibility: there is no Internet - there are no boxes with letters either.

No need to guard at the mailbox

For instant notification of a new incoming message, you need to either keep the tabs with drawers open, or install some kind of browser plugin - both options are rather inconvenient. In addition, even a plug-in will not save when you close the web browser - an important letter will come, but you will not see it right away.

Mail clients contact the servers themselves and request information about new messages. If the answer is yes, you immediately receive a notification that is hard to miss.

But!

There are also plenty of disadvantages to email clients. Here are the nastiest ones.

There are so many functions in them that you can't figure it out right away.

If browser versions of mailboxes are made as simple as possible, then developers often get carried away with applications, stuffing them with all sorts of options, functions and settings that most users do not care about.

As a result, instead of just adding mailboxes and enjoying life, you have to delve into the jungle of the interface, trying to find where the signature is installed, and how to disable the stupid spell checker.

Multiplatform is a complete disaster

If you often have to work with mail on different devices with different operating systems, then applications will hardly be a suitable solution. And then there is the addictive effect: if you "stick" to one application, then it is inconvenient to use another, even if they are the same in functionality.

Importing contacts can be tricky

If browsers at the very least have learned to pull up history and logins with passwords from each other, then mail applications do not always do it successfully so far. Typically, the problem occurs when importing contacts from a different application than the web version.

As a rule, there are no problems with large solutions (Microsoft Outlook, Mozilla Thunderbird). In the settings, an item like "Export" is selected, a file with contacts is created, then in the new client click on "Import" or a similar button, and the document is added.

Less common or not very recent applications can use their own formats for storing data, and then you will have to suffer a lot by transferring what you need to other services, for example, Google Contacts.

Security is also not very clear

Any program has vulnerabilities, and email clients are no exception. There is an opinion among experts that the more archaic the application, the more reliable it is, because there are no loopholes for hacking in the form of additional scripts and extensions. Mutt can be considered a kind of benchmark, but only the most fierce paranoids will be able to use it in 2017 without pain in the eyes - this application is shamelessly outdated in design and convenience fifteen years ago.

So do you need an email client, and if so, which one?

We at the site are sure that the pros outweigh the minuses, and it's still better with a mail program than without it. The problem is that there are no perfect mailers, so you still have to turn a blind eye to the shortcomings.

So we have selected the best email clients for different platforms: some are on Windows, others are on OS X, and others are both there and there, and you decide which one suits you best.

Microsoft Outlook

The app is convenient due to its tight integration with other Windows services and is great for work email. For example, there is a link to the to-do list and the calendar, which will help optimize your work and make it more comfortable. Microsoft Outlook is also all right with multiplatformity: apart from desktop OS, the application is available for iOS and Android.

The problem is that The Outlook client is part of the Office 365 suite, which is priced at RUR 2699 per year for a personal version. Get Word, Excel, PowerPoint and other standard programs in the load. If you need Microsoft Outlook specifically, then hold on - it is bought one-time and costs 8199 rubles. With many free analogues, this is, to put it mildly, an exorbitant amount.

Apple Mail

The standard OS X application has decent functionality - it is quite possible to do with it. The client is free and comes immediately with operating system for Mac. The work with the main services is supported: Google, Yahoo! Among the pleasant bonuses is the ability to slightly edit the image attached to the letter by adding a comment or highlighting the desired area.

The problem is that it is a mail client only for "apple devices".

Mailbird

The free mail client Mailbird impresses with its laconic, but at the same time very modern appearance, which can also be customized indefinitely. In addition, you can set combinations for hot keys: switching between folders, reply to all participants in the correspondence, and so on, this greatly speeds up the work.

The client has synchronization not only with the usual services - Dropbox, Google Calendar, Todoist, but also with social networks and instant messengers - Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp.

The free version supports up to three accounts, while there is no limit for the paid version ($ 1 per month / $ 22.5 for life). In addition, the Pro version has another useful feature - the ability to postpone an incoming letter for later, so that after a specified time a second reminder of the received message will come.

The problem is that Mailbird is a Windows mail client and only for Windows.

Spark

This is a mail program for Apple technology: the application first appeared on iOS, and then reached OS X and watchOS. Spark follows the logic of the popular Mailbox, closed a year ago. The main folder stores new and important letters, and when they are no longer relevant to you, you can move them to the archive.

The service is free and works fast. You can set parameters for a quick response, such as "Thank you", "OK" and so on.

The problem is that in the desktop version it is unusual to work with gestures at first, but if you use a trackpad or Magic Mouse, then the control will be quite intuitive. For example, to delete a letter or move it to another folder, you can hover the cursor and move it to the left or right: this will bring up several options. In addition, along with swipes, you can select the usual buttons to select a letter or transfer to another folder.

AirMail

Another popular email client for Mac and iPad / iPhone with Apple Watch, is also controlled by gestures. There is also support for the TouchBar in the new MacBook Pro. Flexible settings, integration with third party services, support for smart sorting, and the ability to connect a bunch of accounts make AirMail one of the best alternative email clients for Apple devices.

The problem is that AirMail has a paid distribution model. The desktop version costs 749 rubles, the mobile version costs 379 rubles. Is it worth paying when the free ones are just as good?

Thunderbird

The mail application was created by Mozilla - the developers of the notorious Firefox browser. The program, like a web browser, is flexible in customization and has a bunch of extensions - useful and not very useful. There is support for modern security systems: suspicious letters are marked, URL verification for authenticity, blocking of automatic download of attached images. Most importantly, Thunderbird is a completely free email client. No trial versions or stripped down functionality.

The problem is that Thunderbird is completely unceremonious in its use of computer resources. Firstly, the function of archiving folders and cleaning deleted folders does not always work, as a result of which a lot of space on the hard disk is wasted, and secondly, the client loves to eat off the RAM.

The Bat!

This email client is extremely laconic and undemanding to resources. But the application provides a high degree of security: data is encrypted on the hard drive, and the letters themselves are processed using SSL and TLS protocols. True, you will have to pay for this: the Home version costs 2,000 rubles, and for the Professional version, which offers even more advanced protection, you will have to pay 3,000 rubles.

The problem is that design by The Bat! - from the last century, and even then the developers hardly bothered with them. Everything looks very simple and impersonal.

Inky

A free email client with a modern design, works under Microsoft Windows, and under macOS, and under iOS, and under Android. The mail application supports an unlimited number of mail records, is able to automatically sort letters by importance, which is especially pleasing when a lot of messages are poured in. In addition, you can manually set the relevance settings: messages from which contacts to raise to the top of the list.

The problem is that support for Google Apps, Office 365, Microsoft Exchange and a number of others useful services is available only by subscription, and you will have to shell out for it $ 5 per month.

Posted by Christin on December 14, 2018

Marketing Manager

Published on December 14, 2018

The enormous power of e-mail is undeniable. Are we sending the latest viral YouTube video to our friends, coordinating an interview or communicating with potential clients. Last year,Radicati Group estimates there are 4.3 billion more mailboxes worldwide ... Pew research suggests that92% of adults use email regularly. She has become an integral part of our crazy tech world, although she has many alternatives. So email is far from dead (the truth is - there is even a site called pochtanedetva.com! ).

If you are in any way like the rest of the mail users, you have probably found yourself some amazing client that can handle absolutely anything. And once you've found your email buddy, it can be very difficult to switch to another email client, and that's why many users simply avoid it. But sometimes, such a step may be dictated by circumstances. Your client may no longer be updated by the developers or is not compatible with the operating system of your new computer.

Moving from Mac to Windows

Many Mac users face this situation. They decided (for some reason) to migrate from Mac to Windows or Linux. You can install a Windows compatible version of your current mail client on your new OS. However, some Mac clients are exclusive and you will have to look for an alternative that works on Windows.

We decided to compile a list of our favorite Windows alternatives for OS X mail clients. All mail clients below support IMAP and POP3, and we decided not to include cost in the comparison, because choosing the perfect mail client is a matter of features, not cost. Please keep in mind that most Windows alternatives are available on Mac as well. We assume that you have not used the applications below yet.

Let's first take a look at the best options available for Mac devices to see what Windows apps have to compete with.

Best email clients for Ma

1. Apple Mail

rights: http://images.macworld.com/

Apple Mail is the default mail client on all Macs and is loved by many die-hard Apple fanatics. Mail offers basic features like the ability to intuitively manage multiple accounts or organize your Inbox to your liking. Along with the bonus of seamless integration with other Apple apps (the main reason to use Mail), it boasts a simple and intuitive interface. It is somewhat similar to the modern version of Outlook, just not so cluttered.

Why popular:User-friendly design, intuitive integration with Apple products

2. Airmail 3

rights: http://assets.ilounge.com/

Airmail 3 is another very popular mail client for OS X. The main reason for this popularity is its beautiful, user-friendly interface and complete personalization. For Apple lovers who preferred the intuitive design of Mail but wanted more functionality and productivity, Airmail 3 is a clear favorite. It offers exactly what you need from an email client, while adding a pinch of progress (like integrations with Asana and Trello) that has made its users happy for the past couple of years.

To integrate Airmail with Asana, open Airmail, go to Settings> Services> Asana> Link. Asana is a great team work app because it helps teams track their work ... To enable Trello integration, go to Airmail Settings Services> Trello> Link.

Why popular:High productivity, personalization.

3. Spark

rights: http://media.idownloadblog.com/

Like the rest of the Mac clients on this list, Spark offers ease of installation and a streamlined interface. The main reason it is one of the most downloaded clients for OS X is its ability to integrate with almost every other productivity tool (Evernote, OneNote, Dropbox, Google Drive, Pocket, and others). There are dozens of additional widgets with which you can create almost a new application, and the main feature of Spark is a smart box that categorizes your emails.

Why popular:Full personalization, complex integration of third-party applications

Now let's move on to the best alternatives to our favorite OS X clients for Windows.

Best Windows Alternatives

1. Microsoft Outlook

rights: https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/

We can't write a roundup of the best email clients for Windows without mentioning Microsoft Outlook. This email client has already “grown a beard” and, as a rule, ruled the ball when it came to a functional email program. You can download Outlook both in desktop form (if it is not already on your computer) or get access to the virtual version. Outlook integrates seamlessly with the rest of the Microsoft Office suite, providing an incredibly productive option for those who like to have a "complete suite." When it comes to mail management and contact integration, Outlook is strong because of its relationship with the Microsoft Office Suite. Outlook is installed separately, and the entire suite is simple, but not as easy to use as you'd like.

Plus, the calendar app has been overlooked for the past few years, making it a bit weaker than other clients. Organization and personalization can be rated Medium in Outlook. He's not chasing new features. MS Outlook can seem confusing, especially for former Mac users accustomed to the simple and intuitive interface of their applications.

What it looks like:A more complete alternative to Apple Mail

2. Mailbird

Inspired by Sparrow, a Mac email client. Our founders loved this email client, but in 2012 it was acquired by Google for $ 25 million. So they decided to create an application similar to Sparrow, but for the not yet saturated Windows market. So Mailbird was born.

Many of our Mac users have come to love Mailbird for its rich personalization, visibility, and simply the best user experience that allows users to become true mail ninjas. Our designs put a lot of effort into creating a simple and intuitive interface to give people a unique alternative to Outlook. Managing multiple accounts in Mailbird is ridiculously easy, storage management is no problem either, with the ability to coordinate Dropbox, Google Docs, Evernore, Asana, and more.

Just yesterday, we launched an alpha version of our newest contact manager, which allows you to import and export contacts from anywhere and keep your entire communication network organized. It syncs with Outlook and Gmail and combines both unique and publicly available capabilities to seamlessly link all of your online contacts.

You can also organize and search email by profile photo or custom folders and shortcuts to keep your system efficient. If you are looking for personalization, then you will love Mailbird. You can customize almost everything from icons, fonts, colors, to shortcuts, languages, notification sounds and a "dark theme." Although Mailbird doesn't have a built-in calendar, and allows you to combine your schedule and mail in one convenient place.

Installation is simple and intuitive. The design and interface of the app are made for those who love great but productivity, and new features are added to improve the user experience. We've added touchscreen support for all devices, third-party app integration for social networks and a high-speed reading function to cut your email reading time in half.

What it looks like:A bunch of integrated apps, personalization and overall experience

3.eM Client

Although personalization in eM Client is better than in Microsoft Outlook, it still remains very similar to it. Contacts and calendars integrate well. Installation is simple and the app as a whole offers incredible personalization and add-on capabilities, which means, like Airmail 3 and Spark, which are available for OSX, or Mailbird for Windows, you can customize your email client for you.

Stylish, simple and user-friendly interface is pleasant and hassle free. Some might argue that this app isn't as modern as the competition, but if you like the basic design of Microsoft Outlook, complemented by the personalization options available in Mac apps like Airmail 3 and Spark, then you'll love the eM Client.

What it looks like:Personalization like Airmail 3 and Spark

4. Thunderbird

Similar to MS Outlook, Thunderbird has been on the market for a while now. While the developers at Mozilla have frozen further development, it is still a very popular choice among people looking for a reliable and free email client.

As with Mailbird and eM Client, managing multiple accounts is a breeze. Importing and exporting contacts is pretty straightforward. And while Thunderbird doesn't come with an intuitive calendar integration, you can download the Lightning add-on to use the calendar alongside the main app. Installing Thunderbird isn't a hassle either. The interface is a bit angular when compared to Apple Mail. This can be critical for some users making their “great transition”. But Thunderbird offers endless personalization options, allowing users to create the app they want - something that even the best ones haven't mastered yet. Mac applications(while).

What it looks like:Works under OS X and Windows, full personalization

So which Windows client is the best for the transition?

In the end, choosing the perfect email client boils down to two things: (1) How often you use it, and (2) the features you want. The main thing is to find the application that works.with you, but not against you.Hopefully the list above helps you find the best email client for your Mac to Windows migration.

What do you think? What's your favorite Windows email client?

Marketing Manager

PR & Media Relations Supporting the team by communicating Mailbird and its great features to existing and potential users and media.

Published on December 14, 2018